Releases of hacked materials--hacks that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government--began that same month. Mueller, III. The order appointing the Special Counsel authorized him to investigate "the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the presidential election," including any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign.
As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel's investigation established that Russia interfered in the presidential election principally through two operations.
First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents.
The investigation also identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign. Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit. It is, word for word, presented exactly as released by the Attorney General of the United States, with no positioning -- such as a celebrity introduction -- that would give it bias or impede its clarity.
One of the most-talked-about investigations in American history, the subject of constant media discussion and speculation, non-stop and controversial attacks from the president, and the eager anticipation of a public wondering what the truth is, this long-awaited publication is an historic event.
The Mueller Report continues Melville House's "tradition of publishing pivotal public documents. No new indictments were expected , according to CBS News. And long-running Justice Department policy means that it's unlikely a sitting president would be indicted.
In fact, Mueller specifically cited the department's policy as the reason his office couldn't even consider charging Trump with a crime. Said Mueller, "If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. In response, Trump criticized Mueller this week as a "never Trumper. In the past two months, lawmakers have weighed in , with Democrats saying Barr showed bias toward Trump and Republicans saying the public release of the redacted report was a positive thing.
Critics note details in the report paint Trump in a negative light. Although Mueller's investigation didn't establish conspiracy on the part of the president, it made no definitive determination on obstruction of justice. Barr's March 24 letter quotes the Mueller report as saying that "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him" on the matter of obstruction.
Barr has opted not pursue an investigation into the questions surrounding obstruction. The law doesn't require the D OJ to release a report on a special counsel investigation.
But the president indicated on March 20 he wanted the report released and said, " Let people see it. Name required. Follow Following. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress. Log in now. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Read full article. More content below. William Barr. Donald Trump. Yahoo News Staff. April 18, , PM. In this article:. Read the full text below. Due to its large size, it may take a minute to load.
That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication.
We have been consulting with Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler throughout this process, and we will continue to do so. Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate congressional requests, we will make available to a bipartisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information.
Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves — with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared. Once again, I would like to thank you all for being here today. I now have a few minutes for questions. Your email address will not be published. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. All Articles. Search for:. Try This!
Yes They Know. Share the knowledge. We also earn a small amount from ads and Amazon links: Click for amount options. Was this article helpful? If so, please consider supporting us; the Internet Patrol has no paywall and is completely free and reader-supported. Click for amount options.
0コメント